Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court April 5th Represented by the Center for 9/11 Justice

By Center For 911 Justice, PRNE
Tuesday, March 22, 2011

NEW YORK, March 23, 2011 - A December 2010 poll conducted by the prestigious Emnid Institute, and
reported in the German magazine "Welt der Wunder," revealed that 89.5% of
German respondents do not believe the official story of 9/11.

The issue is heating up in America as well, and will soon be heard in
court.

Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop saw disturbing things up
close that have not been reported in the media.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, she was ordered by her supervisor
to go directly to work at the Pentagon, before dropping off her ten-week-old
son Elisha at day care.

Amazingly, the infant was given immediate security clearance upon
arrival.

The instant Gallop turned on her computer an enormous explosion blew her
out of her chair, knocking her momentarily unconscious.

Escaping through the hole reportedly made by Flight 77, she saw no signs
of an aircraft - no seats, luggage, metal, or human remains. Her watch (and
other clocks nearby) had stopped at 9:30-9:31 a.m., seven minutes before the
Pentagon was allegedly struck at 9:38 a.m.

The 9/11 Commission reported that "by no later than 9:18 a.m., FAA
centers in Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Washington were aware that Flight 77
was missing and that two aircraft had struck the World Trade Center."

Why then were there no anti-aircraft defenses, Gallop asks, or alarm
warnings inside the Pentagon?

Gallop was briefed by officials not to tell her story in public; she also
received an email from a Fox News reporter who had been told by the Pentagon
not to interview her.

Gallop now believes that officials within the Bush Administration
conspired to destroy the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and WTC 7 -
the third building brought down at 5:20 p.m. that day - with pre-placed
explosives detonated after the planes hit.

On April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church
Street in New Haven, Connecticut, the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and
Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd
Circuit.

Gallop's case relies on virtually all forms of evidence admissible in
court, but significantly, on published scientific evidence that residues of
these explosives were found in the rubble after the attacks. In its totality
the proffered case establishes that the government hypothesis - that the
buildings collapsed due to fire in combination with the airplane impacts - is
scientifically untenable.

In addition, Ms. Gallop will, through photographic and other physical
evidence, as well as the testimony of a multitude of military and civilian
survivors, demonstrate the impossibility of her having lived through the
attack on the Pentagon if it had taken place as the government and the
defendants claim.

German Federal Judge, Deiter Dieseroth, stated in December 2009 that:

"No independent court has applied legal procedures to review the
available evidence on who was responsible for the attacks."

Also, that "it is not acceptable for a constitutional state…to declare
war, bomb a foreign country, and place it under military occupation," without
first identifying suspects.

Dieseroth also said the U.S. "was under burden of proof" that Osama bin
Laden
was responsible for the attacks, yet the FBI admits it has no evidence
presentable in court to back this up.

The stakes in this case are epic, including the possibility of an
overwhelming transformation of the world's understanding of history, not to
mention American citizens' relationship with their government.

William Veale centerfor911justice at gmail.com, 292929 at msn.com, +1-510-845-5675, +1-925-212-3678

YOUR VIEW POINT
NAME : (REQUIRED)
MAIL : (REQUIRED)
will not be displayed
WEBSITE : (OPTIONAL)
YOUR
COMMENT :