World Programming Secures High Court Victory Against SAS

David Slays Goliath as 30 Year Monopoly is Ended

LONDON, July 23, 2010 - World Programming Ltd (WPL), a fast-growing UK-based company and a
relatively recent entrant to the world of data management and business
analytics software, has today secured a major legal victory in the High Court
against analytics software giant SAS Institute, heralding the end of SAS
Institute's 30 year monopoly in platforms for SAS language applications.

In a legal battle described as 'David v Goliath' by industry insiders,
SAS Institute claimed that WPL's use of the SAS Learning Edition product when
developing its own World Programming System (WPS) language interpreter
software was a breach of terms of use and infringed its copyright.

In a High Court verdict handed down today, Friday 23 July, Mr Justice
Arnold rejected SAS's claim that WPL's drop in 'clone' of the SAS System
infringes the copyright in the SAS system or the copyright in SAS's Manuals.
In addition, European law protected WPL from breach of SAS's licence terms
where WPL used the SAS Learning Edition to observe, study and test its
programming functions when it developed WPS. Following previous UK case law
and the EU Software Directive, the judgment reasoned that copyright protects
the source code of the SAS system as a literary work which WPL had not copied
and that replicating the functions of software, however complex and at
whatever level of detail, is not an infringement of copyright.

Customers who have legacy programs written in the SAS Language will now
be able to choose whether to continue with the SAS system or elect for the
far less expensive alternative where WPS software provides the required
functionality.

The only area in this large and complex case where the judgment went
against WPL was that Mr Justice Arnold ruled that the wording of one of the
WPS user manuals was too close to the wording of SAS's user manuals, although
he accepted that WPL's management had policies in place to avoid this
happening. WPL will now withdraw and re-write that manual in light of the
findings in the judgment, but this has no impact on WPL's customers or on
WPL's ability to supply WPS or support its customers.

Commenting on the judgment, Oliver Robinson of WPL said: "It has been a
long old tussle during which every possible argument and procedural device
have been thrown at us. Thanks to the very determined support and commitment
from our legal team and staff, we have clearly established the validity of
WPS as a legitimate and lawful alternative to SAS. We are looking forward to
competing with SAS Institute in the expanding market for data analytics and
continuing to offer great value and quality to our loyal and growing
worldwide customer base."

Alexander Carter-Silk, head of IP, Technology and Commercial at Speechly
Bircham, who led the WPL legal defence team, added: "By expediting this
hearing and controlling procedural devices, the courts have provided WPL with
access to justice. The levels of complexity and arguments developed during
the case were exceptionally challenging but I have no doubt at all that the
right result was achieved."

Thanks to the clarity and depth of the court's reasoning, the UK now
leads Europe in the interpretation of the EU Computer Software directive. The
court will now refer its judgment to the European Court of Justice for that
court to confirm its interpretation of the directive at European level.

Whilst a judgment of the ECJ may be three years away, the UK judgment
opens the way for WPL to continue innovating and opening new markets.

Notes to editors

Background to the case

The history of the WPL vs. SAS Institute Case: The SAS Institute brought
the case against WPL in October 2009 and alleged misuse of the SAS Learning
Edition, breach of copyright and other intellectual property infringements.

WPL applied to the High Court in England for an expedited trail because
it considered the allegations were without merit and that WPL's business was
being damaged by the publicity that the SAS Institute had made of the claim.

An expedited trail was agreed by the court and the full trial was heard
in London during three weeks in June 2010. Judgment was passed down on Friday
23rd July 2010.

EU Software Directive: This is a European Union Directive which seeks to
harmonise copyright law across all 27 member states of the European Union. It
was enacted by the Treaty of Rome in 2001. The Software Directive has been
amended recently to implement the WIPO Copyright Treaty which is an
international treaty of some 184 member countries.

European Court of Justice: The European Court of Justice ('ECJ') is the
highest court of the European Union in matters of European Union Law. It is
not possible to appeal the decisions of national courts to the ECJ, but
rather national courts refer questions of EU law to the ECJ.

In the WPL vs. SAS Institute case Mr Justice Arnold has expressed his own
conclusions in favour of WPL but he has asked the ECJ to clarify that his
judgment is in line with European Law. This is not the same as an appeal but
is a reference.

European Treaties require the ECJ to ensure the consistent application of
EU law across the EU as a whole in an attempt to avoid different national
courts interpreting and applying law in different ways.

Whilst the reference process takes time the end product is consistent
application of law across the European Union that now has 27 member states
and 22 official languages.

European Law must also harmonize with the World Intellectual Property
Organization (WIPO) treaties, in particular the WIPO Copyright Treaty
('WCT'). The WCT is an international treaty with major countries including
member states of the European Union and the United States of America as
signatories.

Speechly Bircham: Speechly Bircham is a City law firm with a strong focus
on personal service and building long term relationships with clients. Over
250 lawyers provide transactional, advisory and dispute resolution services
to three main client markets: business clients, private clients and clients
in the real estate, construction and engineering sector. Commercial clients
include UK and international listed companies, banks, financial institutions,
funds, professional services organisations, entrepreneurs and privately owned
businesses. The firm's highly regarded private client practice looks after
the interests of private individuals, families and trusts.

Speechly Bircham Intellectual Property, Technology and Commercial: Our
IP, Technology & Commercial group provides a 360degrees solution advising
clients on all aspects of managing, exploiting, defending, promoting and
extending their intangible assets so as to maximise returns and minimise
threats. The group advises technology suppliers and users, as well as
businesses, entrepreneurs and high net worth individuals, celebrities and
insurers on branding, technology transfer, protection of reputation, data
protection and information security and dispute resolution. Much of the
group's work is international.

For further information about Speechly Bircham please visit:
www.speechlys.com

WPL: World Programming Limited produces the WPS Software for use by a
wide range of users from individuals and academics to multi-national
businesses and organisations. Their software supports the language of SAS for
processing data on Workstations, Servers and Mainfraime systems. Over eight
years World Programming has built a highly-rated reputation for reliability,
cost savings and customer support.

For further information about World Programming and WPS Software please
visit www.teamwpc.co.uk.

SAS: SAS is the largest independent vendor in the business intelligence
market and is used in over 100 countries.

For further enquiries, or should you require a version of this press release in another language, please contact: Andrew Pincott, press office, on +44(0)20-7427-6489, andrew.pincott at speechlys.com; Tali Robinson/Beth Farrer, Spada (PR agency), on +44(0)20-7269-1430, talirobinson at spada.co.uk or bethfarrer at spada.co.uk